LANSING — As artificial intelligence companies race to build massive data centers across the country, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is drawing a line on one issue she says shouldn’t be negotiable: existing electric customers shouldn’t have to pay for the infrastructure needed to power them.

Whitmer this week unveiled a Michigan Affordability and Responsible Growth Pledge, asking data center developers to voluntarily commit that Michigan families and businesses won’t bear the costs of new power plants, transmission lines, substations and other electric grid upgrades required to serve their projects.

The announcement comes as Michigan competes for billions of dollars in AI-related investment, including Oracle’s proposed multi-billion-dollar hyperscale data center in Saline Township and other large projects under consideration across the state.

But almost immediately, consumer advocates applauded Whitmer’s goal while questioning whether voluntary commitments provide enough protection for ratepayers.

“We are glad to see Gov. Whitmer taking a stance in support of Michigan’s electric ratepayers,” said Chris Trubac, assistant director of the Citizens Utility Board of Michigan (CUB). “However, a voluntary pledge is not enough. Michigan needs enforceable requirements ensuring that data centers pay the full costs and risks associated with serving them, without shifting those costs to residential customers.”

Trubac said consumer organizations should also have a formal role reviewing future agreements between utilities and data center developers.

“As an independent advocate for Michigan’s residential utility customers, CUB believes these agreements should receive full and transparent review, with an opportunity for organizations like ours to scrutinize the costs and consumer protections before they take effect,” he said. “We hope the Governor will support contested cases for future data center agreements so these protections can be fully evaluated and enforced.”

Five Questions Every Michigan Resident Should Ask About AI Data Centers

  1. Will my electric bill increase?

  2. Who pays for new power plants and transmission lines?

  3. How much water will these facilities use?

  4. How many permanent jobs will they create?

  5. What happens if a company abandons a project after infrastructure is built?

Michigan At The Center Of The AI Infrastructure Boom

Michigan has become an increasingly attractive destination for hyperscale data centers because of its available land, reliable water supplies, existing electric infrastructure and proximity to major manufacturing and technology industries.

Projects being discussed or proposed could represent tens of billions of dollars in investment over the next decade while creating thousands of construction jobs and hundreds of permanent technology positions.

But those facilities also require enormous amounts of electricity.

A single hyperscale AI data center can consume as much electricity as a mid-sized city, forcing utilities to build new generating capacity, transmission lines and substations to meet demand.

That has raised concerns nationwide that residential customers could eventually be asked to help pay for infrastructure built primarily to serve some of the world’s largest technology companies.

What Whitmer Wants Companies To Promise

Under the governor’s proposed pledge, companies would voluntarily commit to several principles designed to protect consumers while supporting economic development.

Among them:

  • Existing residential and business customers would not subsidize infrastructure serving new data centers.
  • Developers would pay the costs associated with connecting to the electric grid.
  • Companies would support investments in new electric generation needed to serve their facilities.
  • Projects would promote responsible water use and environmental stewardship.
  • Developers would work with Michigan communities while creating jobs and economic opportunity.

Whitmer is also urging lawmakers to codify many of those principles into state law.

A Debate Already Playing Out At The MPSC

The governor’s announcement comes as the Michigan Public Service Commission has spent months developing policies governing how large electric users—including hyperscale data centers—connect to the grid.

Earlier this year, the MPSC approved special tariff structures designed to ensure large new customers bear the costs associated with serving their facilities rather than shifting those expenses onto existing ratepayers.

The commission has repeatedly emphasized that utilities seeking to serve major data centers must demonstrate those projects will not unfairly increase electric bills for other customers.

Oracle Project Put Spotlight On Michigan

Public attention intensified after Oracle announced plans for a multi-billion-dollar AI data center in Saline Township.

The proposal sparked debate over electric demand, water consumption, tax incentives and whether local residents would ultimately benefit from the project.

State regulators have said Oracle plans to use advanced water recycling systems designed to minimize groundwater withdrawals, while utility officials have emphasized that new infrastructure serving the project would be paid for through special agreements.

Still, the project helped elevate broader questions now being asked nationwide:

Who pays for AI infrastructure?

How much electricity will future data centers require?

Can states attract billions in private investment without increasing utility bills for existing customers?

The Bigger Question

For Michigan, the debate is no longer whether AI data centers are coming.

The question is how to balance economic development with protecting consumers from higher electric bills.

Whitmer believes voluntary commitments, combined with future legislation, can provide those assurances.

Consumer advocates argue only enforceable legal requirements and full public review will guarantee Michigan families aren’t left paying for infrastructure built to power the AI economy.

As competition for AI investment accelerates, that debate is likely to shape Michigan’s energy policy—and electric bills—for years to come.