LANSING – A Michigan Senate

Republican plan to increase funding for roads by more than $1 billion will

likely see a committee vote Tuesday and a full Senate vote Wednesday, sources

said.

The road funding plan Senate Republicans

are expected to move would increase the gasoline tax by 5 cents per gallon a

year for three years, redirect $700 million from other sources and reduce the

income tax, sources told Gongwer News Service on Monday.

Senate Republicans are expected to

discuss the plan Tuesday, and if there is enough support – and sources said

they expect there is – then the Senate Government Operations Committee would

report the plan at a meeting scheduled for 4 p.m. Tuesday. The committee

noticed that meeting earlier today, and Senate Republican spokesperson Amber

McCann said it was in the event the caucus had a roads plan ready.

She declined to provide other

details.

Sources said the cuts and fund

shifts would take effect January 1, 2017, and that the gasoline tax would rise

according to inflation once the three-year, 15 cents-per-gallon increase was in

place. The gasoline tax would first rise by 5 cents on October 1 with

subsequent increases in 2016 and 2017.

In total, the plan would find $1.4

billion, although sources said not all of the money would immediately go toward

construction as some of it would towards repaying debt.

One area of the proposal that

remained unclear Monday was how it would change the income tax. What sources

described was that the income tax rate, now at 4.25 percent, would drop by 0.1

percentage point if the General Fund was robust enough. How far the rate could

drop was not immediately clear, but several Republicans said they hoped it

could fall as far as 3.9 percent, where the rate stood from July 1, 2004, until

October 1, 2007, when it increased to 4.35 percent.

Under the 2007 increase, it

eventually was to roll back to 3.9 percent by October 1, 2015. However, the

income and business tax changes enacted in 2011 set the income tax rate at 4.25

percent and cancelled the rollback.

Legislative Republicans have said

they would like to return the income tax to that 3.9 percent rate.

Each 0.1 percentage point of the

income tax is worth about $200 million.

Another aspect that is unclear is to

what extent Democratic votes would be needed to increase the gasoline tax.

Prior to Monday, Senate Republicans had not briefed Democrats on the details of

the plan, and Senate Democrats already had told Republicans not to bother

coming to them for votes on road funding after the Republican majority passed a

repeal of prevailing wage.

Senate Minority

Leader Jim Ananich (D-Flint) said he and Senate Majority

Leader Arlan Meekhof (R-West Olive) have talked about the plan in loose

terms, but has yet to see “one line of text.” Mr. Ananich declined to

discuss whether Senate Republicans have approached him about Democratic votes

for a road funding plan, and his preference is for a plan everyone can support.

“I’m hopeful that we can still

get there, but I think we’re a long ways off right now,” he said.

The $700 million in cuts, if that is

what the plan contains, is a major concern, Ananich said. The focus has been on

finding at least $1.2 billion in new revenue for roads, Ananich said, and it

needs to be sustainable, not subject to the whims of the appropriations process.

On the income tax component, Ananich

said residents deserve a tax break, but he was unsure of reducing the rate as

the mechanism, saying it would “exacerbate the problem of the cuts.”

Sen.

Steve Bieda (D-Warren) said he is open to any plan but hopes Republicans

will consider Democratic proposals like addressing the impact of truck weights

on roads.

“I’m willing to take a serious

look at anything they bring forward,” he said.

Bieda, however, did raise some

concern at the expectation that the Senate would quickly pass a plan.

“It strikes me as a really big

policy change to just jam through there,” he said.

Senate Republicans will discuss the

plan at a Tuesday retreat.

This story was published by Gongwer News Service. To

subscribe, click on www.gongwer.com